| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Access a namespace | 31 Jul 2009 16:27 GMT | 2 |
Hi all; Suppose my domain name is Contoso.com. What is the differences between the following to addresses when I access the Marketing namespace: \\contoso.com\Marketing
|
| Long Delays in DFS Namespace Referral Requests | 30 Jul 2009 18:03 GMT | 2 |
I have been having this trouble for a while now, and I have an open case with Microsoft support to work on this issue, but so far, we have not been able to solve this. When accessing a DFS namespace share, if the share has not been
|
| is there a DFS template for documentation purpose | 30 Jul 2009 15:41 GMT | 4 |
I would like to have a dfs template, so that i can update my documentation. Is there a ready-made template on the net ?
|
| hub/spoke | 29 Jul 2009 18:18 GMT | 5 |
windows 2003 r2 After a hub/spoke is done, all members become multi-replication or all equal parnters. To maintain a hub and NOT to receive updates from branch (hub only pushes
|
| winzip and dfs compression | 29 Jul 2009 18:18 GMT | 1 |
if my files are already winzip, does the DFRS replication algorithm helps further in compression ?
|
| is robocopy the best method or DVD media before the initial replication ? | 28 Jul 2009 21:22 GMT | 1 |
I've a master source and i wish to distribute files to the receiveing partner. Should i use robocopy from master source to receiving partner or will a DVD media suffice before initial replication takes place ?
|
| What happens if one partner is shutdown temporary ? | 28 Jul 2009 01:50 GMT | 3 |
windows 2003 r2 standard edition Say i've 2 replicated servers. One master (server A), one receiving partner. (server B) After the master repllicates all data to receiving partner for some days,
|
| how do i determine the initial repllication has completed between master and receiving partner and all become equal partners ? | 27 Jul 2009 23:06 GMT | 2 |
At what stage do i know when initial replication has completed ? Is there a status that shows all partners are all equal now ?
|
| Really odd problem | 27 Jul 2009 08:29 GMT | 3 |
I had set up three replication groups to replicate three separate folders within the same root folder I then deleted all three replication groups. I then configured dfs to replicate at the root folder level only. The
|
| NAMESPACE servers | 27 Jul 2009 06:47 GMT | 3 |
windows 2003 standard edition r2, using domain namespace only I've 3 DFS server runnning in country A, B, C 1. Should i create a domain namespace in a *separate* servers or i can pick any countries's server to host domain namespace ?
|
| Is permissions inherit from authorisative member ? | 27 Jul 2009 06:38 GMT | 3 |
If i make a server an authorisative partner during INITIAL repllication, subsequently the receiving partners, all partners inherit the permission from the initial authorisative primary member ? If that is the case, if i want to enforce permissions, i must plan such a
|
| Two offices using same data / documents? | 24 Jul 2009 17:30 GMT | 1 |
I'm just cutting my teeth on DFS, after the current setup has fallen over. While i'm sat here seeing and working out what's going wrong, it's occurred to me that if you use DFS between multi sites, it is going to be very easy to loose versions of data. i.e 2 people working on ...
|
| Strange secutity issue with DFS | 24 Jul 2009 11:52 GMT | 5 |
Windows 2008. I currently have a DFS share named Termed Staff which contains a folder of each staff name and their documents. Now, I have a security group "SEC-Termed Staff" which allows staff access to
|
| Windows Server 2003 Access-based Enumeration in a DFS environment | 23 Jul 2009 23:57 GMT | 1 |
We have Windows Server 2003 Access Based Enumeration in a DFS environment. How or where do you go to set the ACL on DFS links as users are able to browse other DFS shares. We have many DFS links exist under the root and currenly if they go
|
| DFS Replication of 400 GB | 23 Jul 2009 21:30 GMT | 5 |
Hi NG, we are storing users home directories on a domain controller running w2k3 enterprise (not R2!) given that we'd like to replicate approx. 400 GB of data to another wk3
|