| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| CCR vs SCR vs SAN replication with Windows 2008, HT/CAS with NLB | 29 Aug 2008 18:44 GMT | 2 |
I'm doing some researh on upgrading to Exchange 2007 Enterprise SP1 and I'm planning on installing it on Windows Server 2008 Enterprise. I am currently running Exchange 2003 SP2 on Windows server 2003 SP2. I have 1 primary site and 1 backup/disaster recovery site. The sites ...
|
| Second HUB installed with no Connector - [WP] | 29 Aug 2008 16:11 GMT | 3 |
I installed my first CAS/HUB1 in my Ex2003 envoirenment all went well a default Connector gets created between 07 and 03 as we all know. But when I installed my CAS/HUB2 it did not create any connector for this between ex2003????
|
| Different forest | 29 Aug 2008 05:33 GMT | 1 |
If we have 2 Exchange 2007 forest with similar root name e.g. at site A we have forest1.com and after company merger, site B is also have forest1.com, can I setup trust between these 2 forests to route email from site A to site B, and vice-versa, as well as to sync the GAL?
|
| Upgrade to 2007 from 2003 + DR scenario | 29 Aug 2008 03:21 GMT | 1 |
At the moment we have 2 sites connected via a 1Mb link WAN. Each site has its own internet access Site A is the main site (around 100 users + first MX record) with Exchange Enterprise 2003 in a cluster on 2 Enterprise Windows 2003 servers.
|
| CAS and Hub load balancing | 28 Aug 2008 21:02 GMT | 10 |
my current e2k3 environment has two FE servers for OWA that are load balancing with NLB. One of them is also a bridgehead for routing internet mail. My Exchange 2003 BE server is in a two node Active-Passive cluster. When I replace my E3k3 FE servers with E2k7 CAS servers, do ...
|
| Mail Flow between 2003 and 2007 remote site - [WP] | 27 Aug 2008 14:25 GMT | 2 |
I was reading a book that ...Please confirm ... Once I upgrade siteA to all Exchange 2007 servers the Exchange 2003 in SiteB will not flow mail? As HUB only flows mail to HUB servers in remote sites??? How will mail flow work between these 2 sites?? Or do I need to upgrade
|
| NIC preference when designing an Exchange server | 26 Aug 2008 22:23 GMT | 1 |
Is there a NIC preference for Exchange, Intel or Broadcomm
|
| Isolating a Hub Transport | 26 Aug 2008 13:33 GMT | 3 |
We use CipherTrust IronMail boxes to re-direct all of our zip files to an Exchange 2003 server with TrendMicro for Exchange. Trend scans the zip and is releases or Quarantines the email depending on file type in the zip. We have migrated to Exchange 2007 and want to have the same ...
|
| Exchange 2007 encryption | 23 Aug 2008 18:53 GMT | 1 |
What are the current options available to - encrypt exchange databases - encrypt email messages THanks,
|
| InterOrg in Exch2007 | 23 Aug 2008 08:03 GMT | 7 |
I'm reading that there's no inter-org tool for Exch2007? So if I need to replicate free busy and public folder from another Exch2003 based org into my Exch2007 org I must also install an Exch 2003 in my Exch 2007 org? Is there any plans to include this interorg tool natively for ...
|
| licensing: ent vs std for non-mailbox role holders | 22 Aug 2008 16:31 GMT | 1 |
we must use enterprise version for the servers which will have mailbox roles installed, but does that also mean that all additional exchange servers holding the remaining roles must run the same version of exchange or not!?
|
| Exchange 2007 design advantage question | 22 Aug 2008 11:37 GMT | 13 |
I am working in an environment with three 2003 Forests. We are going to deploy Exchange 2007 but have some design questions. We don't know if we should stay with three forests or make two children of one so we only have one forest. Exchange 2007 docs recommend the second but it ...
|
| Building a new Exchange Server - Advice Please! | 20 Aug 2008 00:17 GMT | 5 |
I was hoping that you would be able to offer abit of advice on a new Dell rack mount server for Exchange 2007. Users: 65 Max Mailbox Size: 500mb Initially although once old GroupWise archiving is
|
| MX - Best Practice Question | 18 Aug 2008 20:31 GMT | 2 |
This is in reference to what is considered best practice for MX records? Hopefully I have found the right group to post this question. If I'm not mistaken, generally a message will take approximately 5 minutes before it times out if none of the given MX records respond. That ...
|
| Domain & Exchange 2000 upgrade to 2008 domain and 2007 Exchange | 18 Aug 2008 20:02 GMT | 1 |
Scenario: A single Windows 2000 domain with Exchange 2000 has to be upgraded to a 2008 domain and 2007 Exchange. Configuration:
|