We have made the decision to move to Exchange2003, mainly for remote device
support and while I'm waiting for my new server to arrive I'm researching
how best to layout the storage groups.
Currently I have about 45GB of mailbox (all in one store), 5GB of pubfld,

Exhange 5.5 server in a W2K forest (Exchange server OS = W2K server)
Single Exchange 5.5 Organization (many sites and servers)
W2K Forest in Native Mode
New 2003 Forest running in Native mode.

Are most or ALL warnings logged after an integrity check (eseutil /G)
harmless if there are no Errors and the message "Integrity check succeeded"
is logged?
Is it safe to ignore the warnings and just proceed to use the databases?

I need some help in this scenario
Scenario:
I have a Windows 2000 forest with 3 domains and one Exchange 2000
organization.

Of POP, SMTP, and whatever else, is Exchange one of those ?  Or is Exchange
native to itself ?  A class of its own - like POP and SMTP ?
I understand Exchange itself can't be POP since it uses POP connector to
connect to some POP server.

We are currently implementing a new exch 2003
implementation. I have read that certain partioning will
give better performance of the exch server.
We have a userbase of around 1200. The server has 6 73G

I currently have multiple AD schemas and multiple Exchange Organisatrions
8 AD Domains
3 Exchange Organisations
We wish to standardise the platform and roll out Exchange across the whole

I have a pretty simple Exchange 03 setup, with a single domain:
my-company.co.uk.  If I have a separate domain (my-company.com) which I would
like to receive emails on, how would I best set this up?
My users will obviously be logging on to the my-company.co.uk domain at the

I upgraded my organization (16,000 users) from Exchange 2000 to Exchange
2003 - by installing the two (clustered) NEW Exchange 2003 servers - without
first upgrading my two Front End OWA servers! Microsoft does not believe I
never got a warning that I have to upgrade FEs first!!!

I am in the process of upgrading to Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003.  However, I'm still going to be on a Windows 2000 Native Forest Functional Level for a while.  Having said that, is there any reason I should upgrade Windows before Exchange.  I would rather upgrade Exchange ...

Can SE databases be restored onto Exchange 2K/2003? Seems to work.
Can Exchange 2K/2003 databases be restored onto SE?
Can an SE database restored (and this seems to work) to 2K/2003 be restored
back to SE?

We're a small company with under 100 employees and are looking to
migrate our Windows 2000 (2x PIII 733GHz, 1.5 GB RAM) and Exchange 5.5
Standard server to a server running Windows 2003 (2x P4 3GHz, 4GB RAM)
and Exchange 2003 Enterprise Edition.

DOes the exchange sever user monitor allow to get stats from Exchange 5.5
machines as well?
J

Is there a way to allow a user to send as multiple aliases with exchange
email.
I have a user whom receives email under 3 different domain names
user@domainA.com, user@domainB.com, user@domainC.com.  Respectively the user

Hello all --
I upgraded a NT4.0 domain and Exchange 5.5 computer to Win2k3 AD and
Exchange 2003.  During the final steps of removing the Exchange 5.5 server,
I made a mistake by not rehoming the public folders to the next Exchange