We plan to install an Exchange 2003 enterprise server
with a 2-node (active and passive) cluster supporting
1,200 mailboxes.
The hardware platform is a Dell PowerEdge 1750 with dual

All,
We currently migrating users from NT4.0/Exchange 5.5 to
AD/Win2k/Win2k3/Exch2k3. We have a two-way trust relationship
established between both domains. Users in AD will need access to

Employees in my office move email messages sent directly to them (for a
specific project) to a designated public folder so that everyone associated
with that project has access.
When viewing these mail items in the public folder, in addition to the

SBS 2003 premium Exchange Server has to be installed to
meet the following requirements:
1. The company has multiple POP3 email accounts with a ISP
and they want to download all emails from these to

What design would be more appropiate and why?
1) ISA in DMZ, Front-end server (OWA SMTP) (internal
network), Back-end Server (internal network)
2) OWA- DMZ, Back- end server (internal network)

I'm going to migrate from NT 4 to server 2003 and from exchange 5.5 to
exchange 2003, both are running on the same server today. Is the same
configuration recomended in server 2003 with exchange 2003, and if so what
are the system reqirements?

I'm about to migrate from NT 4 PDC, to server 2003 Domain Controller and
from exchange 5.5, to
exchange 2003. Both are running on the same server today. Is the same
configuration recomended in server 2003 with exchange 2003?, and if, what

Does anyone know if a limitation was placed on the number
of rules and alerts that each mailbox can have in
exchange. Seems after the upgrade user can't use some of
thier rules and get a message about out of space/memory.

Do i have to install Active Directory on the server which
is going to install Exchange 2003 or i just need a Domain
controller sitting on my LAN?  if we install Active
Directory, doesn't it mean the server has been promoted as

I hace configured 6 mail enabled public folders.  These
folds are for "customer service", "accounting", "support"
etc.  They are working great.  All emails that are set to
these email address get drop into these folders.  My

Imagine I have two servers, identical hardware. Primary goal is setup a
redundant solution for OWA 2003.
Any significant advantage of using NLB over DNS RR ? DNS RR is pretty
straighrfoward to configure, and that's why I would like to check and see if

I have 2 location (NY and Mia) I currenty have 1 exchange
5.5 server in Mia that serve the entire company. I am
planning to migrate to E2k3 and I would like to find out
how I could redesign to have some kind of redundancy in

Can a Windows 2000 Pro workstation run Outlook 2003 using RPC over HTTP?
The MS online demo said XP Pro was a requirement but I'm not seeing this as
a minimum in the Outlook 2003 "Inside Out" book from Microsoft press.
Thanks!

I am planning to upgrade one of our exchange 2000 server
to 2003 to take advantage of the mobile feature in 2003.  
However, i don't want to upgrade my other 2000 servers
yet.  But we use public folders in your exchange and they

I have Exchange 2003 standard and would like to upgrade it to Exchange 2003
enterprise edition.  I have found kb article 170280, but it does not
specifically reference Exchange 2003, it references previous versions of the
software.  Any suggestions? Any cautions i should be aware ...