>> Scenario...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> will be using their respective ISP (or some other Internet DNS Server) to
> resolve Internet DNS names.
Network A has a DNS-Server: DNS-A with a Primary Forward-Zone:
INTRANET-A.DOM
Network B has a DNS-Server: DNS-B with a Primary Forward-Zone:
INTRANET-B.DOM
So that both Networks can be resolved by all Clients, one Solution is to
make:
on DNS-A a secondary Zone from INTRANET-B.DOM where the Master is DNS-B
and
on DNS-B a secondary Zone from INTRANET-B.DOM where the master is DNS-A
you just have to make shure, that the Zone-transfer works between both
DNS-Servers.
This is best done by adding each DNS-Server in each ZONE and ALLOW
ZONETRANSFER to all DNS-Servers in ZONE
sorry about my English, good look
Werner
>>> Scenario...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>>> To my knowledge I need this for the "A" windows DNS server will not
>>> repsond to systems not part of the domain.
Werner Penz - 28 Jun 2007 17:06 GMT
soory... it must read:
on DNS-A a secondary Zone from INTRANET-B.DOM where the Master is DNS-B
and
on DNS-B a secondary Zone from INTRANET-A.DOM where the master is DNS-A
> Network A has a DNS-Server: DNS-A with a Primary Forward-Zone:
> INTRANET-A.DOM
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
>>>> To my knowledge I need this for the "A" windows DNS server will not
>>>> repsond to systems not part of the domain.
>>> Scenario...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> will be using their respective ISP (or some other Internet DNS Server) to
>> resolve Internet DNS names.
> Alright Im glad to see you know your stuff and Ill explain myself a little
> more clearly. Both networks "A" and "B" have Intranets. In order for
> both networks to properly browswe each others Intranets I believed the
> solution is to just forward DNS resolutions to each other in order to have
> their local urls resolved properly.
Browsing is a NetBIOS application -- for browsing to work across multiple
subnets you need (replicated) WINS Servers, and for every machine
(especially
DCs and other servers) to be WINS Clients.
> Knowing this, how would you recomend this be done. I do know network "A"
> is a microsoft domain, and I believe "B" is not.
For DNS resolution or PRIVATE DNS names (not available on the Internet)
you need to use Conditional Forward A->B for B.zones, and B->A for A.zones
OR if Conditional Forwarding is NOT available then B much hold a secondary
for A zones and vice versa.
You might use Conditition Forwarding in one direction and Secondary for the
other -- Win2003 DEFINITELY supports Conditional Forwarding, 2000
does NOT, and other DNS servers will depend on their feature set.
> Adding standard secondary zones?
That will ALWAYS work for DNS resolution -- but browsing is NOT a
DNS application.
You need NetBIOS for Browsing, and that means a practical need for
REPLICATED WINS Servers when you have more than one subnet.
> I appreciate the help ..
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>> To my knowledge I need this for the "A" windows DNS server will not
>>> repsond to systems not part of the domain.
fern - 28 Jun 2007 17:29 GMT
>>>> Scenario...
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> the solution is to just forward DNS resolutions to each other in order to
>> have their local urls resolved properly.
Sorry browsing was a poor choice of words... surfing!
> Browsing is a NetBIOS application -- for browsing to work across multiple
> subnets you need (replicated) WINS Servers, and for every machine
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>>>> To my knowledge I need this for the "A" windows DNS server will not
>>>> repsond to systems not part of the domain.
Herb Martin - 29 Jun 2007 04:07 GMT
>>>>> Scenario...
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Sorry browsing was a poor choice of words... surfing!
No problem that is why I gave both answers anyway.
>> Browsing is a NetBIOS application -- for browsing to work across multiple
>> subnets you need (replicated) WINS Servers, and for every machine
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>>>>> To my knowledge I need this for the "A" windows DNS server will not
>>>>> repsond to systems not part of the domain.
fern - 29 Jun 2007 14:14 GMT
>>>>>> Scenario...
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>>>
>>>>> You cannot use two DNS servers a MUTUAL (unconditional*) forwarders.
So in conclusion I guess we all agree that adding each other as forwarders
is not a proper solution and highly not recommended.
I should setup new zones on both networks and have them be able to transfer
to each other.
Agreed?
>>>>> You can conditionally forward a Windows 2003 (not 2000) to another
>>>>> DNS server for some specific DNS zone (tree).
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>>>>>> To my knowledge I need this for the "A" windows DNS server will not
>>>>>> repsond to systems not part of the domain.
Herb Martin - 29 Jun 2007 14:55 GMT
>>>>>> You cannot use two DNS servers a MUTUAL (unconditional*) forwarders.
>
> So in conclusion I guess we all agree that adding each other as forwarders
> is not a proper solution and highly not recommended.
I hope we all agree because not only is it "not recommended" it will
typically
crash BOTH DNS Services.
You have created and INFITE LOOP for anything that cannot be resolve
on at at least one of the servers
A->B->A->B-A->...............................................
> I should setup new zones on both networks and have them be able to
> transfer to each other.
That always works even with older DNS servers.
> Agreed?
Or you can CONDITIONALLY forward for specific zones from either or
both of them IF the DNS Server in question (e.g., Win2003) supports this.
Expect older DNS servers to NOT support this -- check newer ones for the
feature.
>>>>>> You can conditionally forward a Windows 2003 (not 2000) to another
>>>>>> DNS server for some specific DNS zone (tree).
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>>>>>>> To my knowledge I need this for the "A" windows DNS server will not
>>>>>>> repsond to systems not part of the domain.
fern - 29 Jun 2007 15:02 GMT
>>>>>>> You cannot use two DNS servers a MUTUAL (unconditional*) forwarders.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Expect older DNS servers to NOT support this -- check newer ones for the
> feature.
I agree, unfortunetly my network runs on w2k DNS so zone transfers it is.
Now all I have to decide is if I should add this zone as an AD integrated or
just a secondary standard. I'm thinking AD for redundancy purposes.
Thanks again for your input.
>>>>>>> You can conditionally forward a Windows 2003 (not 2000) to another
>>>>>>> DNS server for some specific DNS zone (tree).
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>>>>>>>> To my knowledge I need this for the "A" windows DNS server will not
>>>>>>>> repsond to systems not part of the domain.
Herb Martin - 29 Jun 2007 16:47 GMT
>>>>>>>> You cannot use two DNS servers a MUTUAL (unconditional*)
>>>>>>>> forwarders.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> I agree, unfortunetly my network runs on w2k DNS so zone transfers it is.
Ok. That is secondaries then.
> Now all I have to decide is if I should add this zone as an AD integrated
> or just a secondary standard. I'm thinking AD for redundancy purposes.
No you do not -- you cannot used AD Integrated for someone else's
Domain/Forest.
They cannot use Integrated for YOUR Domain/Forest AD Integrated DNS
You can only be a Secondary to them*, and they can only be a Secondary to
you.
*You don't have Win2003 which would technically open up Stub zones or
AD Integrated across domains but in the SAME FOREST, but you cannot
do AD Integrate across multiple domains otherwise.
You certainly cannot do AD integrated ACROSS unrelated domains.
This doesn't affect YOUR ability to use AD Integrated internally (which is
usually the best choice) because these DNS servers/zone can have ordinary
Secondaries (doing zone transfers) anyway.
> Thanks again for your input.
Happy to help.

Signature
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
(phone on web site)