Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Windows Server 2003 / DNS / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Do I need to have a root entry

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Aughtooting - 27 Jul 2005 11:25 GMT
Hi there,

I am currently setting up my 2003 AD.
This is going to cover various sites(all over Europe).
Every site will have a proxy server (freebie linux boxes)

I am using intergrated DNS.
Do I need to have a root entry in my Windows 2003 SP1 DNS boxes?

I am getting a DNS Event ID 706 in the event viewer.
"The DNS server does not have a cache or other database entry for root name
servers. ...........To correct this problem, use the DNS console to update
the server root hints."

Because of my proxies I do not need any name resolution outside of my AD
domain's.

Obviously I cannot ignore this error so what should I do? or can I ?

Regards
Todd J Heron - 27 Jul 2005 14:31 GMT
> Hi there,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Obviously I cannot ignore this error so what should I do? or can I ?

You can delete the root entry and this will get rid of the error.  If you do
not need Internet resolution provided by DNS, disable recursion and do not
configure any Forwarders.

Signature

Todd J Heron, MCSE
Windows Server 2003/2000/NT; CCA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights

jackson_140@hotmail.com - 27 Jul 2005 15:42 GMT
Hi there Tod,

I hope you don't mind me butting in, but would he not need to add at
least conditional forwarding?( I do accept that this will "turn off"
name reslution for the internet9

I don't see how he could otherwise do internet name resolution and the
Lan name resolution.

regards John
Todd J Heron - 27 Jul 2005 15:51 GMT
> Hi there Tod,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> regards John

No problem John.  The Proxy servers can do that for him (web, ftp traffic)
so long as they are configured for external resolution.  As he didn't state
the need for anything else I left my answer at that.

Signature

Todd J Heron, MCSE
Windows Server 2003/2000/NT; CCA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights

jackson_140@hotmail.com - 27 Jul 2005 16:20 GMT
Thanx for answering that.

John
Sharad Naik - 27 Jul 2005 16:38 GMT
Hi Todd,
I was curiously watching this thread.
All the clients and server will have to point to the local DNS server.
Web can use the proxy server.
But how about other applications, like antivirus, mail clients etc.
(assuming he doesn't have local mail server).

Ofcourse the OP has not raised such issues, may be in his network he doesn't
want users to give external access to such applications,
or had not considered this while deciding that he doesnt need his DNS to
resolve external queires.

Am just curious whether the proxy can take care of such applications too.

Also his proxys will be forwarding to external server so what would be the
harm if he deletes the root zone and
use forwarders?

Sharad

>> Hi there Tod,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> state
> the need for anything else I left my answer at that.
Todd J Heron - 27 Jul 2005 16:55 GMT
> Hi Todd,
> I was curiously watching this thread.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Sharad

Yeah Sharad, I see no harm if he deletes the root zone and use forwarders.

Signature

Todd J Heron, MCSE
Windows Server 2003/2000/NT; CCA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights

Sharad Naik - 27 Jul 2005 17:09 GMT
On second thoughts, OP already has a root zone and is happy with it execept
for the error.
So your first answer to OP's post was correct and appropriate. :)
Sorry for confusing with earlier post.

Sharad

>> Hi Todd,
>> I was curiously watching this thread.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Yeah Sharad, I see no harm if he deletes the root zone and use forwarders.
Aughtooting - 28 Jul 2005 11:20 GMT
Many thanks for your help guys.  You pointed out things that did not cross
my mind.

My AV updates come from internal servers.
My Security updates come from internal servers
My mail clients do not require external resolution. The SMTP server takes
care of that(and its not part of the AD).

I find that most applications come with an oppertunity to configure a proxy
setting.
However if they do not work or there is not "proxy setting" then forwarding
is the only way.

One final question Todd.  You say that I should delete the root entry and
this will get rid of the error.  However was it not that by deleting the root
entry that I got this error in the first place?  

Regards,

> On second thoughts, OP already has a root zone and is happy with it execept
> for the error.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >
> > Yeah Sharad, I see no harm if he deletes the root zone and use forwarders.
Manny Borges - 28 Jul 2005 11:06 GMT
> Web can use the proxy server.
> But how about other applications, like antivirus, mail clients etc.
> (assuming he doesn't have local mail server).

To conserve bandwidth and simplify management these critical network
services can be handled by a server based solution which negates the need
for external resolution.

And I will go out on a limb and say that in any corporate environment you
should centralize these kinds of apps.

Particularly Antivirus. Symantec (not playing favorites, just picking one)
Corp can gather updates and push them down to clients with much more
expediency than say 300 clients all fighting for bandwidth to download the
same files.

Since the OP did not mention any issues with other services, but does
mention that proxies are set up, it may be safe to initially assume that
they have these bases covered.

Signature

Manny Borges
MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
MCT, Certified Cheese Master

The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
-- Marty Feldman

> Hi Todd,
> I was curiously watching this thread.
> All the clients and server will have to point to the local DNS server.

> Ofcourse the OP has not raised such issues, may be in his network he
> doesn't want users to give external access to such applications,
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>> state
>> the need for anything else I left my answer at that.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.