i use local area network (100Mbps) to communicate. i use wmencoder, wms and
wmp9. broadcasting type is multicast. i canceled bufferring from wms. there
is still 5 secs. delay. is it normal?
Yes.
> i use local area network (100Mbps) to communicate. i use wmencoder, wms and
> wmp9. broadcasting type is multicast. i canceled bufferring from wms. there
> is still 5 secs. delay. is it normal?
i noticed taht delay is 16 secs for both 384 and 100 Kbps lan stream. how
can i change buffer size to reduce this delay?
"News Hunter" <newshuntertr@hotmail.com>, haber iletisinde ?unlar?
yazd?:e0aGVcMyDHA.384@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> i use local area network (100Mbps) to communicate. i use wmencoder, wms and
> wmp9. broadcasting type is multicast. i canceled bufferring from wms. there
> is still 5 secs. delay. is it normal?
Mike M. - 23 Dec 2003 14:56 GMT
I have never gotten below 15 seconds. You can fiddle with the buffer size
but there will always be a short delay.
> i noticed taht delay is 16 secs for both 384 and 100 Kbps lan stream. how
> can i change buffer size to reduce this delay?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> there
> > is still 5 secs. delay. is it normal?
MovingHunter - 23 Dec 2003 15:36 GMT
now i got 8 secs delay
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/howto/articles/BroadcastDelay.
aspx
"Mike M." <nospam@someplace.com>, haber iletisinde ?unlar?
yazd?:ux07lVWyDHA.4064@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I have never gotten below 15 seconds. You can fiddle with the buffer size
> but there will always be a short delay.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > there
> > > is still 5 secs. delay. is it normal?