1. Depends on the encoding rate. That configuration will handle
around 800 mbps of live wms streaming. Thus if your encoding rate is
500 kbps, it will handle 1,600 concurrent live viewers.
2. You would need a connection that would handle the bandwidth. At
500 kbps encoding rate, 100 people would require 50 mbps.
When you say 'standard cable internet' if you are referring to
residential, then NO. A residential cable connection will support a
couple of viewers.
> 1. I've got a server with dual xeon processors, 8MB, dual 120GB hd's,
> 10/100/1000 mbps card and connect to the internet via cable. Can you tell me
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I appreciate any help anyone can provide me. Thanks,
> John
JBM - 17 Jul 2008 15:27 GMT
My residential cable connection is 10 Mbps, and I was planning on only
encoding at about 65 to 80K, but if I were encoding at 100K on a 10 Mbps
connection, theoretically, I should be able to have 100 simultaneous viewers?
Again I appreciate the help, and I'm just trying to see if it's more cost
effective to setup my server as a wms rather than pay alot of money for
something I may be able to use my system for.
> 1. Depends on the encoding rate. That configuration will handle
> around 800 mbps of live wms streaming. Thus if your encoding rate is
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > I appreciate any help anyone can provide me. Thanks,
> > John
TotalStream.net - 18 Jul 2008 11:30 GMT
If you encode at 65 to 80 kbps, then you will have listeners, not
viewers
> My residential cable connection is 10 Mbps, and I was planning on only
> encoding at about 65 to 80K, but if I were encoding at 100K on a 10 Mbps
> connection, theoretically, I should be able to have 100 simultaneous viewers?