Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Windows 2000 / Update / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Need to down grade

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Overbey - 22 Jul 2006 00:45 GMT
I need to down grade from XP back to 2000, due to performance reasons.  Has
anyone done this?  If so, do you lost your settings?
Thanks
doverbey@optonline.net
Gary Smith - 22 Jul 2006 06:02 GMT
The only way you can go from XP to 2000 is to wipe everything and do a
clean install.  You'll lose everything.  All software will have to be
reinstalled, and you'll have to save all the files you want to keep and
restore them after the install.

> I need to down grade from XP back to 2000, due to performance reasons.  Has
> anyone done this?  If so, do you lost your settings?
> Thanks
> doverbey@optonline.net

Signature

Gary L. Smith
Columbus, Ohio

DL - 23 Jul 2006 11:09 GMT
What performance issues?
If you can run win2k there should be v.little difference in winxp

> I need to down grade from XP back to 2000, due to performance reasons.  Has
> anyone done this?  If so, do you lost your settings?
> Thanks
> doverbey@optonline.net
Overbey - 25 Jul 2006 23:00 GMT
Actually, when the box was running win2k, it only had 384m of memory with
twin 200meg processors.  In trying to get XP to run, the memory was upped to
512m.  The performance is a dog, Window graphic is slared, windows do not
open in a timely fashion, applications take for ever to start.  If there  is
something that I can do to increase the performance, by all means tell me
(reg tweaks etc...).
dudley

> What performance issues?
> If you can run win2k there should be v.little difference in winxp
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> Thanks
>> doverbey@optonline.net
DL - 26 Jul 2006 01:57 GMT
Presumably you checked your hardware manu. for updated drivers?
Set winxp to Classic View

> Actually, when the box was running win2k, it only had 384m of memory with
> twin 200meg processors.  In trying to get XP to run, the memory was upped to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >> Thanks
> >> doverbey@optonline.net
Overbey - 26 Jul 2006 23:34 GMT
Yes, have check all of that.
Thanks again will recheck to make sure I did not miss anything
Dudley

> Presumably you checked your hardware manu. for updated drivers?
> Set winxp to Classic View
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> >> Thanks
>> >> doverbey@optonline.net
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] - 23 Aug 2006 16:29 GMT
> Yes, have check all of that.
> Thanks again will recheck to make sure I did not miss anything
> Dudley

Your hardware should be able to run XP with no problems; XP is really the
same thing as 2k as far as the kernel is concerned; it just has more
features/bells and whistles/and the annoying Teletubbies/Fisher-Price
interface.

Check in msconfig for startup items you don't need, switch to Windows
Classic display (and even the classic start menu), and in control panel |
system | Performance/settings button, use "adjust for best performance"
rather than "let windows decide".

You might also do a disk cleanup & defrag if this box has been in use for a
while....just don't 'compress old files' when prompted in disk cleanup.
That's usually a bad idea.

>> Presumably you checked your hardware manu. for updated drivers?
>> Set winxp to Classic View
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> doverbey@optonline.net
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.