I recognize this behaviour from sus/wsus in a test environment, and I do
think it is to do with a user issue and what method you pick for installing
the updates i.e notify for install, schedule etc.
I think with local admins, the assumption is that with this more powerful
user, they get an option to install now or later etc. If scheduled install
for domain users you may find a difference
> Hi, apologies for crossposting but need this to get to as many people who
> may be able to offer help as possible.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Any help much appreciated.
Andrew Story - 26 Jan 2006 13:38 GMT
A reply from an MVP (Lawrence Garvin) in a different group, may help other
in a similar situation...
To force the installation on a client in which a user has admin rights, you
can:
(a) Instruct the local admin to leave the Windows Update Agent alone, and
the machine powered on during the scheduled installation time, at which time
the system will install the update(s) in a completely unattended fashion.
(b) Assign a deadline to an update for a time far in the future. This will
prevent the local admin from being able to unselect the update for
installation, but the admin can still preemptively initiate the installation
interactively, if so desired.
(c) Enable the User policy "Remove all access to Windows Update features",
which will block all access to the WUA User Interface, Windows Update, and
Microsoft Update. Not recommended, as this will also prevent the
installation of Optional Updates that are only available via WU/MU.
> I recognize this behaviour from sus/wsus in a test environment, and I do
> think it is to do with a user issue and what method you pick for installing
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> >
> > Any help much appreciated.