Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Windows 2000 / Update / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

.net versions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tim - 20 Jan 2006 19:38 GMT
does .net version 2 replace ver 1?  i would have thought it does but
sometimes am promplted to install ver 1.1 or other even though 2.0 is
already there?
Lawrence Garvin (MVP) - 24 Jan 2006 22:44 GMT
Sort of.. but not really. They're designed to sit side-by-side, just like
v1.0 and v1.1; however, some v1.1 code will run on the v2.0 framework.
(There's no guarantee, however.)

A lot of v1.1 based code will -not- run on the v2.0 framework and will
expect to see the v1.1 framework. There is an admin setting where you can
tell the v1.1 apps to use the v2.0 framework, but I don't recommend doing
that unless you're extremely familiar with the .NET Framework -and- you have
sufficient resources to thoroughly test the execution of your v1.1
application in the v2.0 framework environment.

> does .net version 2 replace ver 1?  i would have thought it does but
> sometimes am promplted to install ver 1.1 or other even though 2.0 is
> already there?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.