Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Windows 2000 / Update / November 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What's the deal with SP4?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
seething rage - 26 Nov 2003 22:49 GMT
Seems very problematic for many who have downloaded it--- I'm getting a
laptop with W2K installed; I will avoid this SP until Microsoft issues some
kind of fix!!
Daniel Chang [MSFT] - 30 Nov 2003 00:37 GMT
That's definitely an option, however, there are many instances where SP4
installs without problems.

When performing a new installation of Windows 2000, your chances of
installing the service pack without a hitch are increased, as there are
fewer (or no) other products installed on your machine that might conflict
with SP installation.

We always recommend thorough testing of updates in your specific
environment.
--
Daniel Chang
Server Setup Team

Search our Knowledge Base at http://support.microsoft.com/directory
Visit the Windows 2000 Homepage at
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/default.asp
See the Windows NT Homepage at http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/

NOTE: Please reply to the newsgroup and not directly to me. This allows
others to add to and benefit from these threads and also helps to ensure a
more timely response. Thank you!
This posting is provided "AS IS" without warranty either expressed or
implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
The views and opinions expressed in this newsgroup posting are mine and do
not necessarily express or reflect the views and / or opinions of Microsoft.

: Seems very problematic for many who have downloaded it--- I'm getting a
: laptop with W2K installed; I will avoid this SP until Microsoft issues some
: kind of fix!!
John - 30 Nov 2003 16:30 GMT
I strongly dissagree!! I have spent most of my 4 day
Thankgiving re-installing WIN 2k - all because of SP 2, 3
or 4!!! A clean install - formated FAT 32 or NTFS still
produces either: "corrupted NTOSKRNL.EXE", or: blue screen
stop error 0x00000071. That with nothing else installed -
either with IE6 or the WIN 2K IE original (5?). My machine
has been running fine - but ever since trying to run
service packs I can not start the OS - WHY do I need the
SP - because my ISP - MSN (!!) - insists in having at
least SP2. So I have now dropped MSN (been with them for 3
years @$22/month) in favor of NetZero HiSpeed dial up.

The point is: I have NEVER held a grudge against
Microsoft - until these last few days. These service packs
are bad for MS PR and are wasting my time.

Is there a fix for these problems - or should I forget the
service packs? My system is now fine - with no SP's.

AMD 1700+,IE6, Gigabyte, 512 RAM, GeForce/Nvidia 400

>-----Original Message-----
>That's definitely an option, however, there are many instances where SP4
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
>.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.