Ok.. I have a quad processor server running 4@550mhz/ea running different
"services" (print, shares, wins, DHCP and such) but not doing to much else..
I would like to setup a SUS server on it but the minimum system requirements
need a (single) 700Mhz processor... Would this run ok on my quad box or
would this be to slow, as the individual processors are slower than the
minimum?
Mark Borchers - 30 Sep 2003 07:44 GMT
I run SUS on a Win2K server running a single P2/350MHz! Runs fiiiine....
Mark
> Ok.. I have a quad processor server running 4@550mhz/ea running different
> "services" (print, shares, wins, DHCP and such) but not doing to much else..
> I would like to setup a SUS server on it but the minimum system requirements
> need a (single) 700Mhz processor... Would this run ok on my quad box or
> would this be to slow, as the individual processors are slower than the
> minimum?
Brad - 30 Sep 2003 16:51 GMT
Thanks for reply... Didnt want chance it...
> I run SUS on a Win2K server running a single P2/350MHz! Runs fiiiine....
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > would this be to slow, as the individual processors are slower than the
> > minimum?
Lucy [MS] - 01 Oct 2003 00:08 GMT
Brad,
I recommend posting on the SUS newsgroup:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.softwareupdatesvcs

Signature
Thanks,
Lucy [MS]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> Ok.. I have a quad processor server running 4@550mhz/ea running different
> "services" (print, shares, wins, DHCP and such) but not doing to much else..
> I would like to setup a SUS server on it but the minimum system requirements
> need a (single) 700Mhz processor... Would this run ok on my quad box or
> would this be to slow, as the individual processors are slower than the
> minimum?