Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Virtual Server / July 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

SCVMM Safe for P2V?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JBradshaw - 21 Jul 2008 17:41 GMT
Trying to figure out a P2V solution.  We're mostly a Dell / Win2K3
environment.  My first couple of attempts at P2V using VSMT were disastrous,
failing to convert and destroying the source machine in the process.

I'm hoping SCVMM is a little more robust, a little less invasive, and an all
around better experience.

What risks are there using SCVMM?  Does it alter or modify the source
machine in any way?  Can I reasonably expect to try it on a production
server without having to worry that it is going to cause a crash or blue
screen or otherwise nuke the OS?
Daniel Petri (MVP) - 22 Jul 2008 08:57 GMT
My $0.02 - it worked pretty well for me...

Signature

Sincerely,

Daniel Petri
MVP, Senior IT consultant, trainer
www.petri.co.il
-----------------------------------

> Trying to figure out a P2V solution.  We're mostly a Dell / Win2K3
> environment.  My first couple of attempts at P2V using VSMT were
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> server without having to worry that it is going to cause a crash or blue
> screen or otherwise nuke the OS?
Rob McShinsky - 23 Jul 2008 04:00 GMT
I have done 50+ P2V migraitons with VSMT and let me tell you the difference
with SCVMM is night and day.  A VSMT migration that used to take 4-5 hours
now takes 1 hour or less depending on the disk type you choose, dynamic vs.
fixed.  For W2K3 systems you want to migrate, it is great.  For W2K machines
it is only mildly more difficult since you still have to provide some
drivers for the offline P2V option.  The only issue I have seen is an
occational conflict with physical servers that have a service that uses port
443 for another application. SCVMM uses port 443 during the migration.  The
workaround was to temporarily disable the service on the physical machine
using port 443 for the migration.  This causes some downtime for the
physical server application, but that is now limited with SCVMM.

Signature

Rob McShinsky
http://www.virtuallyaware.net

> Trying to figure out a P2V solution.  We're mostly a Dell / Win2K3
> environment.  My first couple of attempts at P2V using VSMT were
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> server without having to worry that it is going to cause a crash or blue
> screen or otherwise nuke the OS?
JBradshaw - 25 Jul 2008 17:17 GMT
Well, I tried my first one in a test environment -- and it worked like a
charm!  SCVMM is SO much easier to use.  A huge step forward, as far as I'm
concerned.  Setup was a breeze, and P2V was practically a one-click task.

I'm ready to roll it out into production -- unfortunately, the server I'd
like to install SCVMM on is a 64-bit machine.  Does anyone happen to know if
SQL 2005 Express will run on Windows 2003 x64?

Thanks for the input.

> Trying to figure out a P2V solution.  We're mostly a Dell / Win2K3
> environment.  My first couple of attempts at P2V using VSMT were
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> server without having to worry that it is going to cause a crash or blue
> screen or otherwise nuke the OS?
Rob McShinsky - 25 Jul 2008 19:43 GMT
Yes, SQL will run on W2K3 x64
(http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/express/sysreqs.mspx  See the notes
section).  If you already have a SQL server installed on another server you
can use that as your SQL source for the database too.

Signature

Rob McShinsky
http://www.virtuallyaware.net

> Well, I tried my first one in a test environment -- and it worked like a
> charm!  SCVMM is SO much easier to use.  A huge step forward, as far as
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>> server without having to worry that it is going to cause a crash or blue
>> screen or otherwise nuke the OS?
Daniel Petri (MVP) - 27 Jul 2008 09:41 GMT
I found that using the "Library" part is a bit problematic, especially the
fact that you can easily delete a VM from a host if you don't know your way
through it.

Signature

Sincerely,

Daniel Petri
MVP, Senior IT consultant, trainer
www.petri.co.il
-----------------------------------

> Well, I tried my first one in a test environment -- and it worked like a
> charm!  SCVMM is SO much easier to use.  A huge step forward, as far as
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>> server without having to worry that it is going to cause a crash or blue
>> screen or otherwise nuke the OS?
Gonzalo Balladares Rivera - 31 Jul 2008 06:11 GMT
Hi.
I've made lots of P2V migrations with SCVMM 2007 to VirtualServer 2005 R2
SP1, mostly from Windows 2000 old-old servers, and there are a few gotchas:
devices drivers and dhcp must be provided in the process... and the p2v will
be done with 0 effort ;)

I Document the entire process in my Blog, in spanish ;)

Regards

Signature

Gonzalo Balladares Rivera
MVP Exchange Server | MCSA: Messaging | MCITP Windows Server 2008, SA
http://gballadares.spaces.live.com - http://www.msglue.org

"JBradshaw" <jbradsha@dphilneas.nnn> escribió en el mensaje de
noticias:9vidnWQXctirIRnVnZ2dnUVZ_qninZ2d@posted.internetamerica...

> Trying to figure out a P2V solution.  We're mostly a Dell / Win2K3
> environment.  My first couple of attempts at P2V using VSMT were
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> server without having to worry that it is going to cause a crash or blue
> screen or otherwise nuke the OS?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.