Why not?
I do it quite often, saves the hassle of installing it later, and is a
little bit of the reason for Sysprep (install everything that you want on
the machines that will be produced, and then image the main computer)

Signature
--Jonathan Maltz [Microsoft MVP - Windows Server - IIS, Virtual PC]
http://www.visualwin.com - A Windows Server 2003 visual, step-by-step
tutorial site :-)
http://vpc.visualwin.com - Does <insert OS name> work on VPC 2004? Find out
here
Only reply by newsgroup. I do not do technical support via email. Any
emails I have not authorized are deleted before I see them.
>| I have built up our production scripted Windows XP (SP1) build in the
> | virtual server and it is working fine. I install the VM additions,
> reboot
> | and then run sysprep with the following switches.
>
> Don't install VM addition if you want to sysprep.
Chency - 28 Dec 2004 13:20 GMT
Maybe I got it wrongly, but didn't you sysprep coz want to deploy on real
machine?
| Why not?
|
| I do it quite often, saves the hassle of installing it later, and is a
| little bit of the reason for Sysprep (install everything that you want on
| the machines that will be produced, and then image the main computer)
Jonathan Maltz [MS-MVP] - 28 Dec 2004 23:58 GMT
Nope - Install was done in VPC, and differencing disks were created after
the Sysprep

Signature
--Jonathan Maltz [Microsoft MVP - Windows Server - IIS, Virtual PC]
http://www.visualwin.com - A Windows Server 2003 visual, step-by-step
tutorial site :-)
http://vpc.visualwin.com - Does <insert OS name> work on VPC 2004? Find out
here
Only reply by newsgroup. I do not do technical support via email. Any
emails I have not authorized are deleted before I see them.
> Maybe I got it wrongly, but didn't you sysprep coz want to deploy on real
> machine?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> on
> | the machines that will be produced, and then image the main computer)