Yes.
It will still show up as 100MBit in the Guest HW, but if you look at the
transfer rate, it will be 1G in speed.

Signature
//David
IIS
http://blogs.msdn.com/David.Wang
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
//
Can the guest os use gigabyte nic in host os by 1G speed?
Justin
¥xÆW·L³n§Þ³N¤ä´©³B - 14 Dec 2004 05:40 GMT
Dear David,
Thanks for your useful information.
Could you offer me the related data that you mentioned?
Thanks!
Justin
> Yes.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Justin
DevilsPGD - 14 Dec 2004 05:57 GMT
> Dear David,
>
> Thanks for your useful information.
>
> Could you offer me the related data that you mentioned?
What related data?

Signature
Can I get a w00t w00t?
????????? - 14 Dec 2004 07:18 GMT
The description that you mentioned such as white paper, web site or forum!
>> Dear David,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> What related data?
DevilsPGD - 14 Dec 2004 07:27 GMT
>>>Dear David,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> The description that you mentioned such as white paper,
>web site or forum!
I'm not sure what you've been reading, but no it didn't.
1) I didn't post anything.
2) The post told you it will show up as 100Mb, which is true.
3) The post said if you look at the actual transfer rate, you will see
1Gb speed.
All true, but there is no website, no forum, no white paper, nothing
else is required.

Signature
It's not an optical illusion. It just looks like one.
Brad - 29 Dec 2004 22:17 GMT
We've done some testing internally and we've found this is not accurate.
We have found that transfer rate/rhroughput through the default
virtualized network card that comes with VS tops out a slightly below
100MB. This was found over numerous files ranging from 500MB to 10GB.
As an example I can copy a 9GB file from a server (on the same subnet
and switch) to the physical host in about 4 min, while a copy from the
same server to the VM takes about 23 minutes. This is also true in
reverse. Transfering between 2 VM's on the same physical host takes
about 44 min.
Is there a way in which we can 'tweak' anything to actually achieve a
higher throughput? Is there another virtual network card we can use?
thanks,
brad.
> Yes.
>
> It will still show up as 100MBit in the Guest HW, but if you look at the
> transfer rate, it will be 1G in speed.
DevilsPGD - 30 Dec 2004 08:06 GMT
> We've done some testing internally and we've found this is not accurate.
> We have found that transfer rate/rhroughput through the default
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Is there a way in which we can 'tweak' anything to actually achieve a
> higher throughput? Is there another virtual network card we can use?
I did a test here and I was able to transfer at approximately 125Mb/s on
my gigE nic. This is roughly consistent with what the host is able to
achieve (and is limited by the remote FTP server)
I was definitely able to exceed the limits of a 100Mb NIC though.

Signature
do not creep a coconut
-- NANAE
Brad - 29 Dec 2004 22:24 GMT
We've done some testing internally and we've found this is not accurate.
We have found that transfer rate/rhroughput through the default
virtualized network card that comes with VS tops out a slightly below
100MB. This was found over numerous files ranging from 500MB to 10GB.
As an example I can copy a 9GB file from a server (on the same subnet
and switch) to the physical host in about 4 min, while a copy from the
same server to the VM takes about 23 minutes. This is also true in
reverse. In addition, transfering between 2 VM's on the same physical
host takes about 44 min.
Is there a way in which we can 'tweak' anything to actually achieve a
higher throughput? Is there another virtual network card available we
can use?
thanks,
brad.
> Yes.
>
> It will still show up as 100MBit in the Guest HW, but if you look at the
> transfer rate, it will be 1G in speed.