Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Small Business Server / SBS 2000 / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Migrating W2K domain to SBS 2003

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mickey - 23 Dec 2003 16:16 GMT
Hi
we've got a Windows 2000 domain with a single DC and we'd like to move towards SBS 2003 (and keeping the current DC and domain name). What is the best way to do that
I thought of adding the new server as a Windows 2000 DC, trasfer the FSMO roles to this server and then upgrade it to SBS 2003. The original DC will be preserved and will act a secondary DC. Could be this the best way

Thanks in advance.
Ric - 23 Dec 2003 16:30 GMT
That sounds like a fair way - but bear in mind that you will have an
upgraded box as opposed to a clean install which I would prefer.  You could
achieve this by installing 2k as a DC on a spare box and transfer the FSMO
roles as you said.  Then upgrade this spare box to 2003.  You will now have
a 2k3 domain to which you can add the new server as a DC and transfer the
FSMO roles again.  Voilla!  You now have a fully clean install of 2k3 but
you keep your existing domain and SIDs.

I like this version slightly better than yours as there won't be any
remnants of a 2000 install hanging around on your box.

> Hi,
> we've got a Windows 2000 domain with a single DC and we'd like to move towards SBS 2003 (and keeping the current DC and domain name). What is the
best way to do that?
> I thought of adding the new server as a Windows 2000 DC, trasfer the FSMO roles to this server and then upgrade it to SBS 2003. The original DC will
be preserved and will act a secondary DC. Could be this the best way?

> Thanks in advance.
Mickey - 23 Dec 2003 16:46 GMT
Thank you Ric. From what I can understand, the third server will be installed as a Windows 2003 DC and then upgraded to SBS 2003. Is this correct?

Mickey
Ric - 23 Dec 2003 16:56 GMT
Sorry, yes that's right.  As I said - your way will work just fine but this
way you will have a cleaner install.

> Thank you Ric. From what I can understand, the third server will be installed as a Windows 2003 DC and then upgraded to SBS 2003. Is this
correct?

> Mickey
SuperGumby - 23 Dec 2003 18:11 GMT
but it's unnecessary.

use the SBS 2003 media to do a clean install on the new hardware but only do
the W2K3 part. Use adprep, from the SBS2K3 CD, to extend your current 2000
AD to accomodate W2K3 DC's ('adprep /forestprep' & 'adprep /domainprep').
Join W2K3 to the domain and dcpromo it into a DC role, move the FSMO roles,
make it a GC, continue with SBS setup.

Did it this afternoon.

> Sorry, yes that's right.  As I said - your way will work just fine but this
> way you will have a cleaner install.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >
> > Mickey
Mickey - 23 Dec 2003 18:41 GMT
Okay, that is gonna be my scenario. I want the SBS machine to hold the FSMO roles and keep the original Windows 2000 DC as an additional DC in the new SBS environment. What you did is just like the installation of a normal W2K3 DC in an existing W2K structure, the SBS part can be performed afterwards and it's pretty straightforward, is this correct?

On the Microsoft website I found also a whitepaper about this issue (http://www.microsoft.com/WindowsServer2003/sbs/upgrade/default.mspx) . It is recommended to use another DNS name, another domain name and use ADMT for migration. This is nonsense.

Thanks again.
SuperGumby - 23 Dec 2003 19:07 GMT
really, it doesn't matter what you want, SBS _must_ have the FSMO roles.

Yes, once you have the 2K3 machine as DC and holding the FSMO roles it's
pretty well 'follow the bouncing ball'.

The upgrade document you refer to has info about two procedures 'upgrade' or
'migrate', the new server name, new domain name, and ADMT is only required
for 'migrate'.

> Okay, that is gonna be my scenario. I want the SBS machine to hold the FSMO roles and keep the original Windows 2000 DC as an additional DC in the
new SBS environment. What you did is just like the installation of a normal
W2K3 DC in an existing W2K structure, the SBS part can be performed
afterwards and it's pretty straightforward, is this correct?

> On the Microsoft website I found also a whitepaper about this issue (http://www.microsoft.com/WindowsServer2003/sbs/upgrade/default.mspx) . It
is recommended to use another DNS name, another domain name and use ADMT for
migration. This is nonsense.

> Thanks again.
Waqar Sheikh - 29 Feb 2004 05:26 GMT
Hi

I would like to know how did your installation go did you have many problems or was it straight forward. Only other question I like to ask is about Exchange Server 5.5 migration from w2k server to SBS 2003 server into Excahange 2003

our Scenario is thi

We have W2K Server with one DC and running exchange 5.5
We have purchased a new server on which we would like to run SBS 2003 with exchange 200
We would like to keep the same domain name and make sbs 2003 as the main DC and make the old w2k server as additional DC

Thanks in advance
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.