Does anyone out there know if it's possible to purchase SBS 2003 BUT run the
SQL server portion of SBS on it's own separate server using the existing SBS
licensing? I have been told this is possible but would like some other
comments...
Purchasing and licensing the individual products incorporated into SBS would
be cost prohibitive for our company so purchasing SBS 2003 (we actually want
to upgrade from our exisiting SBS 2000 product) would be the way to go for
us. However, we would prefer to run the SQL Server portion on it's own
server...
Thoughts?
Thanks, Brad
SteveB - 04 Sep 2008 21:26 GMT
No you can't separate out all the individual components and put on other
servers. 2003 R2 does give you expanded CAL rights so that you can use those
CALs to access another server with separate SQL licensing. Perhaps you
should get SBS 2003 PE with SA which will then give you an upgrade to SBS
2008 PE when released which does have a 2nd server capability.
> Does anyone out there know if it's possible to purchase SBS 2003 BUT run
> the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks, Brad
Brad Pears - 10 Sep 2008 18:27 GMT
Thanks for the info...
What is the "PE" and "SA" versions you are referring to?
Brad
> No you can't separate out all the individual components and put on other
> servers. 2003 R2 does give you expanded CAL rights so that you can use
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>
>> Thanks, Brad
SteveB - 11 Sep 2008 15:36 GMT
PE=Premium Edition SA=Software Assurance
> Thanks for the info...
> What is the "PE" and "SA" versions you are referring to?
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>>
>>> Thanks, Brad
SuperGumby [SBS MVP] - 04 Sep 2008 21:29 GMT
Please don't multipost Brad (same Q to many groups as separarte messages),
crossposting is 'correct form' (one message to relevent groups).
> Does anyone out there know if it's possible to purchase SBS 2003 BUT run
> the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks, Brad
Brad Pears - 10 Sep 2008 18:26 GMT
Sorry about that...
Brad
> Please don't multipost Brad (same Q to many groups as separarte messages),
> crossposting is 'correct form' (one message to relevent groups).
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>
>> Thanks, Brad