I know this is a simple question, but after considering the issues that is
happening to my client, I was wondering... he has seven (7) PC's logging onto
the network at the same time.
I am wondering if perhaps this is the reason for his problems as to why the
network constantly crashes when accessing applications?
Or is it still simply the fact that a DHCP server has to be installed?
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP] - 06 Mar 2008 17:24 GMT
Are you running Small Business Server 2000
It should be running as the DHCP server
You can have a max of 50 users if you CALs for all of them

Signature
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-------------------------------------------------
Microsoft MVPs
Independent Experts (MVPs do not work for MS)
Real World Answers
---------------------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly regarding issues
I know this is a simple question, but after considering the issues that is
happening to my client, I was wondering... he has seven (7) PC's logging onto
the network at the same time.
I am wondering if perhaps this is the reason for his problems as to why the
network constantly crashes when accessing applications?
Or is it still simply the fact that a DHCP server has to be installed?
tlc_13200@hotmail.com - 06 Mar 2008 17:35 GMT
Thanks Cris-
I was wondering about that. I do appreicate your immediate response.
Thank you, again!
> Are you running Small Business Server 2000
> It should be running as the DHCP server
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Or is it still simply the fact that a DHCP server has to be installed?
bmepcc@gmail.com - 11 Mar 2008 20:10 GMT
Go to SBS Admin console, right-hand side, about. That will tell you
the amount of licenses available for your server. SBS comes with 5
CALs, IIRC.
Pat
On Mar 5, 1:04 pm, tlc_13...@hotmail.com
<tlc13200hotmail...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> I know this is a simple question, but after considering the issues that is
> happening to my client, I was wondering... he has seven (7) PC's logging onto
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Or is it still simply the fact that a DHCP server has to be installed?