: Is basic authentication useful against automated attacks (e.g. those
: attacks using buffer overflows).
:
: Regards,
: Bulent
Ken,
Thank you for your quick response.
I assume that a much greater number of components would be involved
"after" the authentication process. If this assumption is correct, is
it fair to say that basic authentication (with SSL) would minimise the
risk of such attacks (buffer overflow) being successful.
Thanks again,
Bulent
Ken Schaefer - 28 Feb 2006 04:18 GMT
: Ken,
:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
: it fair to say that basic authentication (with SSL) would minimise the
: risk of such attacks (buffer overflow) being successful.
Yes. Anything that prevents the payload from getting to the vulnerable
component would help.
So, requiring SSL would stop any attack that only operated over HTTP
Using Host-Headers would stop any attack that didn't supply a Host: HTTP
header
Using Basic Auth (or any Auth) would stop attacks that couldn't supply a
username/password
All of this does assume that the affected component is after the barrier.
Mostly this will stop automated attacks - manual attacks are a different
matter (but generally manual attacks would be directed against valuable
servers, not a server you might have sitting at home running your personal
website).
Cheers
Ken
Bulent - 28 Feb 2006 05:04 GMT
This is the answer I needed.
Thank you very much.