Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Exchange Server / Design / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Exchange Performance/Sizing Question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jwilmer - 20 Sep 2006 19:15 GMT
We have about 150 new users coming into our Exchange org.  The total email
size is about 800gig.  From what i understand, the size of the store comes
from the number of emails not attachments etc.  

These new users are very demanding and will really complain if there are
performance problems.

The IT Dir ordered a Dell 2860 dual proc / 4 gig mem.  We mirror the
partitioned internal drives that have OS, page and Exch Binaries.  The DB and
Logs are on separate SAN drive(s).

I am concerned that this single server will not perform 100% and I will have
complaints.  Our normal setup limits the total DB sizes to about 300-400 gig
with about 200-250 users on a similar box.  Our performance is good.

MY Question:
What are the key factors in determining performance and sizing of an Exch
2003 SP2 server.  Store size, total # of emails on the server, total # of
users supported, processor, memory etc.

Thanks for your help!!
Bharat Suneja [MVP] - 20 Sep 2006 19:37 GMT
CPU, Memory, but primarily Storage. Your storage should provide enough disk
IO for the number of users you have.

You need to determine what is the volume of email traffic per user - number
of messages sent/received, et al - per day - which determines their usage
profile and the disk IOPS required per user.

Then you go about sizing storage so it provides adequate disk IOPS.

Optimizing Storage for Exchange Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/guides/StoragePerformance/
fa839f7d-f876-42c4-a335-338a1eb04d89.mspx


Performance and Scalability Guide for Exchange Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/guides/E2k3Perf_ScalGuide/
10be5826-45b2-48e7-8450-4ec8dd63beb0.mspx


Calculate your server size
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/guides/E2k3Perf_ScalGuide/
ccec1c70-a3df-404a-93e0-b74077e3d013.mspx


If starting afresh, there are also tools like Loadsim and JetStress that let
you validate your server performance and storage design and figure out what
kind of load it can take before you deploy, but that doesn't seem like an
option in your case since you're already in production.

Signature

Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------

> We have about 150 new users coming into our Exchange org.  The total email
> size is about 800gig.  From what i understand, the size of the store comes
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Thanks for your help!!
John Fullbright [MVP] - 21 Sep 2006 02:52 GMT
The bottleneck will be storage.  SAN by itself brings no particular
advantage in terms of performance unless the LUNs are sized properly.  Take
a look at "Optimizing Storage for Exchange Server 2003", determine your IOPS
requirement, then ensure that when the SAN LUNs are provisioned, they will
meet this requirement.

> We have about 150 new users coming into our Exchange org.  The total email
> size is about 800gig.  From what i understand, the size of the store comes
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Thanks for your help!!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.