More information is needed. What is the logic behind the rules?
As for the reason, after Exchange accepts the mail, it will resolve the
recipient to an internal recipient address. It uses the primary address as
the one to send for. If it comes from the internet, it should have a
slightly different header shown. What you'll need to do is check out the
headers in more detail to see what can be used to base your rules on.
Well I just tracked it down to the fact that in my rules I was not only
moving the email to the appropriate sub-folder, but was also copying the
email into a public folder. When I remove the copying process from the rule,
everything started working perfectly. It appears that copying to a public
folder is what causes this wierd behaviour. So now I need to figure out a way
to copy emails into a public folder not using rules.
What I would really like is a 'second copy' of the entire shared mailbox,
which remains untouched, almost like a backup. What I have done is create a
public folder and set the permissions for all our users as read only. So if
they accidentally delete a folder in the main mailbox, we can use this one as
a backup.
I'm not sure how to do this in exchange. I do recall that mail which arrives
into one mailbox can be forwarded to another one, but can it be forwarded to
a public folder?
> More information is needed. What is the logic behind the rules?
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> >
> > Any pointers appreciated!!!
Al Mulnick - 27 Aug 2006 20:55 GMT
I haven't tried this, but the alternate recipient setting might be what
you're after. If not, you *could* use journaling to accomplish that task. Of
the two, I would prefer the alternate recipient with the original still
delivered in the recipient's mailbox.
> Well I just tracked it down to the fact that in my rules I was not only
> moving the email to the appropriate sub-folder, but was also copying the
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>> >
>> > Any pointers appreciated!!!