Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Exchange Server / Design / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Exchange Distributed Authority Model

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Michael Deering - 15 Nov 2005 17:21 GMT
Can someone point me to some resources for the Exchange Distributed
Authority model?

Setting up exchange environment where it would be optimal if each political
unit could administer their own set of mailboxes. Due to bandwidth
considerations, with most traffic being local, I am thinking that a server
in each geographic region would be best. Any thoughts on that?

Thanks,
Mike
Paul Ford - 18 Nov 2005 20:44 GMT

A centralised v decentralised Exchange model largely depends on network
bandwidth, network utilisation and probably the biggest factor, network
latency.

Remote users will normally generate between 3 - 5 kbps, Outlook cached mode
can alleviate this as it can reduce the number of bytes on the wire by
between 25% - 50% percent depending on the traffic being sent. i.e. a word
document or excel spreadsheet will compress more than a jpg or a zip file.
Also there are certain things that cached mode cannot help with, have a look
at the Practices to avoid when you use Outlook 2003 with Cached Exchange
Mode section in
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;870926. Also take a
look at http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/assistance/HA011402591033.aspx

When you say each political unti could administer their own set of
mailboxes, do you mean Exchange servers ?

Regards

Paul Ford
Edge IT Ltd

> Can someone point me to some resources for the Exchange Distributed
> Authority model?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Thanks,
> Mike
Michael Deering - 29 Nov 2005 12:12 GMT
Thak you Paul,

What I mean by each political unit administering their own set of mailboxes
is that we have multiple departments, each with varying needs. Each of those
would maintain it's own set of mailboxes, OU style, which are housed on a
fixed set of Exchange servers. Another consideration is to have a server
located in each region.

Unfortunately, Microsoft seems to neglect this model rather severly. They
just brush past it as a note. With no real solid documentation.

Thanks,
Mike

> A centralised v decentralised Exchange model largely depends on network
> bandwidth, network utilisation and probably the biggest factor, network
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
Paul Ford - 30 Nov 2005 09:25 GMT

So a single Exchange server could house several departments mailboxes which
need to be administered by each department individually ?

Paul

> Thak you Paul,
>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.