
Signature
I never wish I was not what I was not when I didn't wish what I was not was
not what I am not.
Pretty much you just open all ports from the FE server to the AD, DNS, and
Exchange servers on your lan. You could narrow it down to about 8 ports and
protocols, but at that point why bother? May as well just allow TCP 443 all
the way to the trusted network FWIW. Of course, if you leave OWA in a DMZ,
you do limit some of the traffic that machine can get to by not allowing it
to attack other resources outside of AD, DNS, and Exchange servers.
Have you considered what ISA can do for you?
As for a white paper, see the FE/BE information at
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/library
Al
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Tim
Tim Gordon - 24 Aug 2005 17:00 GMT
> Pretty much you just open all ports from the FE server to the AD, DNS, and
> Exchange servers on your lan. You could narrow it down to about 8 ports
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>
>> Quick question: We are currently running Exchange 2003 Enterprise inside
[snipped quoted]
Thanks Al,
Can't really consider ISA. This is at a site that is secured by another
party and any changes to the firewalls I must run past them in advance -
hence my post.
Tim

Signature
I never wish I was not what I was not when I didn't wish what I was not was
not what I am not.
Al Mulnick - 24 Aug 2005 19:35 GMT
That's interesting because you're going to be making firewall changes
regardless, right? In this scenario, don't think of ISA as a firewall
device, but as an Exchange extension instead. It'll make more sense because
you're not deploying a new firewall that way.
>> Pretty much you just open all ports from the FE server to the AD, DNS,
>> and Exchange servers on your lan. You could narrow it down to about 8
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Tim