Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Exchange Server / Design / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Exchange storage design question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ezechiel Darvas - 24 Feb 2005 17:05 GMT
Hi all,

We will have to replace our Exchange 2000 hardware. We got an interesting
offer from DELL: 4 x 72 Gb disks. We have an Exchange database of 10 Gb and
300 users. I don't know which RAID level to choose:
1) 2x RAID 1 (system & logs, database)
2) RAID 5 : One volume (with raided 3 disks) separated into 3 partitions
(system, logs, database) + 1 spare disk
3) RAID 0+1 : 3 partitions (system, logs, database)

Any comment or suggestion would be appreciated.

Ezechiel
Jim Schwartz - 26 Feb 2005 17:59 GMT
It is considered best practice to separate out the OS, Logs and DBs on
separate physical drives. Depending on the amount of users you have, you
could take option 1 which will at least separate your logs and DBs.
Separating out by partitioning your drive gives you nothing.

If you start to experience performance issues (high write/read latencies,
log file stalls) go and get yourself another set of disks and move the log
files off of the OS drive.

> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Ezechiel
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.