Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsWindows Server 2003Windows 2000Windows NTSmall Business ServerVirtual ServerExchange ServerIISHost Integration ServerISA ServerSMSWSUSMOMWindows Media ServerSecurityCertification
Related Topics
SQL ServerMS WindowsMS OfficePC HardwareMore Topics ...

Windows Server Forum / Exchange Server / Design / August 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Building a new Exchange Server - Advice Please!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tim999 - 27 Jul 2008 18:30 GMT
I was hoping that you would be able to offer abit of advice on a new Dell
rack mount server for Exchange 2007.

Users: 65
Max Mailbox Size: 500mb Initially although once old GroupWise archiving is
completed this will reduce to 200mb/250mb
Usage: Medium to Heavy usage

We are moving across from a Netware/GroupWise environment and it is logical
to move to Server 2008/Exchange 2007. Despite the relativley small user base
I think its best to have fileserver, dns, dhcp, domain controller, global
catalog on another server leaving Exchange on its own box.

And why Dell? We have a Dell premium account and in my years as an admin I
have never experienced any major issues. Swings and roundabouts choosing
between Dell and HP from what I have read. PowerEdge 2950 seems a logical
choice but I am no expert.

This is only to provide an initial idea and I intend on having a day of
consultancy prior to purchasing everything to run over migration plan.

My greatest concern is over doing it of the spec side of things. I've come
from an environment of 400 odd users so 65 is not a huge amount.

In terms of disk arrangement i'm thinking:

System RAID 1
Logs RAID 1
Mailboxes RAID 1/RAID 5/RAID 0+1?

Is the above over doing uit for just 65 users?

Would anyone have any recommendations for such a server config? 8 gig of RAM
suffice?

Mailbox, Hub Transport, Client Access will be on the one server. No need for
edge as firewall is locked down to only receive from our Mail Filtering
provider. All archiving done on external mail filtering and Exchange 2007
journaling will provide archiving of internal mail upto email filtering
provider. Exchange Standard version should suffice.

Thanks for any feedback - if your interested in anything else please let me
know.

ps for those migrating from GroupWise the Quest tools are a must! Working
very well in test environment.
John Oliver, Jr. [MVP] - 28 Jul 2008 02:42 GMT
Looks good from my point of view and using Windows 2008 Server as the OS is
good move IMHO.  Dell Poweredge 2950 is very solid server and would suggest
Dual Processor/QuadCore.  8GB RAM is good but for the money you can probably
go to 16GB for minimal cost.  Journaling will add some overhead to the
server so the extra RAM and Processor will help.   Further info,
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/09/25/428994.aspx

Signature

John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2008
Microsoft Certified Partner

>I was hoping that you would be able to offer abit of advice on a new Dell
> rack mount server for Exchange 2007.
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> ps for those migrating from GroupWise the Quest tools are a must! Working
> very well in test environment.
Tim999 - 28 Jul 2008 21:03 GMT
Thanks for your comments.

Looks like I am going with the Dell 2950.

OS 15k SAS 73gig RAID1
LOGS 15k SAS 73gig RAID1
MAILSTORE 10k SAS 146gig RAID1+0

x2 Quad Core Processor
16gig RAM

Server only takes 8 disks in 2.5" mode so I can only have 10k for mailstore
in order to get desirable storage space for 4 years.

Sound good?

Thanks!

> Looks good from my point of view and using Windows 2008 Server as the OS is
> good move IMHO.  Dell Poweredge 2950 is very solid server and would suggest
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> > ps for those migrating from GroupWise the Quest tools are a must! Working
> > very well in test environment.
John Oliver, Jr. [MVP] - 28 Jul 2008 21:53 GMT
15K drives would be better for the mailstore but for 65 users its not going
to suffer if you have 10K.  You have a good config that will allow for
growth in your Exchange environment.  Food for thought, if you really wanted
the 15K 3.5 drives then go with a 2900 Tower with Rail Kit.  Not sure how
much rack space you have available but you can get 2 more drives with the
flex bay in the 2900 Tower and it allows for the Hot Spare.  Something to
consider.

Signature

John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2008
Microsoft Certified Partner

> Thanks for your comments.
>
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
>> > Working
>> > very well in test environment.
Tim999 - 29 Jul 2008 10:31 GMT
Thanks John, you've been really helpful.

I did take a look at that model before deciding on the 2950, for the same
reason about the 15k disks, but its a 5U beast and there isnt really room for
further expansion in the comms room. Only thing I need to sort now is where
my LCR will be kept.

I now need to spec out the domain controller/file/print server machine. I'm
thinking a similar spec but with 6 disks so I can have 15k 300gig for data.
I'm hoping for some advice on this over at the Server 2008 forum!

SAN is out of price range!

Thanks again - much appreciated!

> 15K drives would be better for the mailstore but for 65 users its not going
> to suffer if you have 10K.  You have a good config that will allow for
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
> >> > Working
> >> > very well in test environment.
dogmanky - 20 Aug 2008 00:17 GMT
Your config looks good to me.  My environment is very similar:

50 users
14GB store
Exchange 2003 SP2 (32 bit)
1 FE (2650 near EOL with 2GB ram)
1 BE 2850 with 4 GB

The BE server is 3 RAID 1 (mirrors) with 10K SCSI drives.

I run Antigen on both servers in addition to using AppRiver.

Spam is nill and performance is very good.

Your specs should perform outstanding with some room for growth.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.