We are a small co and I was wanting opinions on installing a new Exchange
Server on the same hardware as our Web Server. Mail Server and Web Server on
the same box?
Web Server is in a DMZ so is there anything wrong with this?
I hate to buy another server if I can use utilize what we have now. else
what is a good argument to add a seperate server just for mail?
Thanks in Advance
Tim
Bharat Suneja [MVP] - 26 Mar 2008 02:48 GMT
- Security is a good argument, imo. In general, you don't want to locate
your Exchange Server in perimeter networks.
- Exchange Servers require access to Domain Controllers.
- Outlook client communication with Exchange server requires RPC
connectivity. You can lock this down to HTTPS by using RPC over HTTP(S).

Signature
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------
> We are a small co and I was wanting opinions on installing a new Exchange
> Server on the same hardware as our Web Server. Mail Server and Web Server
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks in Advance
> Tim
Martin Blackstone - 26 Mar 2008 02:53 GMT
You have major security risks here.
Just the holes you need to punch from the LAN to the DMZ for AD to work are
enough to invite trouble.
Separate server on the LAN.
> We are a small co and I was wanting opinions on installing a new Exchange
> Server on the same hardware as our Web Server. Mail Server and Web Server
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks in Advance
> Tim
Andrew Sword [MVP] - 27 Mar 2008 10:47 GMT
As the others have mentioned separation is required for security. Also it
depends on how much load the server is under with everything combined.
Here's a link on how to set things up for a single 2003 server.
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Implementing-RPC-over-HTTPS-single-Exchange-
Server-2003-environment.html
> We are a small co and I was wanting opinions on installing a new Exchange
> Server on the same hardware as our Web Server. Mail Server and Web Server
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks in Advance
> Tim