> Hi Lanwench,
> the reason of this migration is moderately complex. This customer have
> lost the system administrator responsible of this Exchange (the guy as
> changed job)
How about outsourcing it to hosted exchange, then? I would certainly
recommend that over going with IMAP and PST file sharing software (which I
doubt MS supports). You're actually going to have far more admin work
otherwise, and nothing is going to work as well to achieve the stated goals
as Exchange.
>and after an acquisition this my customer need to adopt
> the new infrastructure standards (outsourcing email server).
I'd speak to whomever is making this decision and explain that if they truly
want what they say they want, Exchange is pretty much the only way to go. Of
course, there's also Groupwise and Notes. You just don't want to move from a
centralized solution like a server (whether on site or off) to a bunch of
PST files sitting on failure-prone IDE drives on users' workstations. Don't
they also care about remote access to their data? Disaster recovery?
> Usually, for this customer, I deploy networking solutions (CIsco &c)
> and this time I'm involved to suggest a compatible solution between
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Finally, sorry for my multi-wrong post!
No worries...
> Thank you!
mac.watson@gmail.com - 13 Jan 2006 15:48 GMT
I'd concur that a hosted Exchange server is what you want. We spent
a good portion of a year trying to make an IMAp+calendar+etc. solution
work, and we had it in house. We eventually bit the bullet and
switched to Exchange. There's just no way to replicate the seamless
integration Exchange offers with multiple third party solutions.
> > Hi Lanwench,
> > the reason of this migration is moderately complex. This customer have
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> >
> > Thank you!
How about looking at an outsourced Exchange box. Plenty of them about.
Nick
> Hi Lanwench,
> the reason of this migration is moderately complex. This customer have
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Thank you!